12/24/2023 0 Comments Iridient n transformer![]() Highlight and shadow recovery capability which LR will never be able to match (take a file with a large dynamic range and see how much you can recover in LR using any method you like. The advanced color editor combined with adjustment layers is surprisingly powerful.Īnd just try using the basic exposure sliders and you will see how much better the algorithms are. It is pretty clearly superior for rendering RAW files.Ĭapture One is also much more powerful for manipulating images. I made the switch with C1 8 (two versions back). And you have real time soft proofing all of the time in C1P. LR CC's Print module is more advanced than C1P, but C1P's printing capabilities get the job done. However, I discovered through trial and error that using the C1P Kodachrome 25 film style and reducing saturation to -30, the results are pretty close to Classic Chrome. It give you great film choices including ACROs and all of the other Fuji films included in the film simulations, except for Classic Chrome. If you are missing the Fuji film simulations in LR, purchase the optional Capture One Film Styles ( Capture One Styles - Film Styles Set for Capture One). I had to split my C1P database in to three smaller ones in order to get reasonable performance. However, C1P does not handle large catalogs very well whereas LR had no problem with my 145k+ image database. Now I am subscription free!Īs far as the IQ with Fuji RAW, C1P (now version 10) is so much better than LR and with less fuss. I cancelled my Adobe Creative Cloud subscription over a month ago. Also, since using Affinity Photo, I stopped using Photoshop CC a few months ago. I switched to C1P over a year ago from LR CC.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |